|
So What if the Government Pays for Most LTC? by Stephen A. Moses
Have you ever wondered why LTC insurance
sales and market penetration are so discouraging? Or why LTC service providers
are always struggling to survive financially and still provide quality care?
Read on. America spent $110.8 billion on nursing home care in 2003.
According to CMS, the percentage of nursing-home costs paid by the government
(mostly Medicaid and Medicare) has been going up for the past 15 years (from
49.6% in 1988 to 58.5% in 2003, up 8.9% of the total) while out-of-pocket costs
have been declining (from 38.5% in 1988 to 27.9% in 2003, down 10.6% of the
total). So what? The consumer's liability for nursing home costs has
gone down precipitously (from 38.5% in 1988 to 27.9% in 2003, a decline of
27.5%) while the government's liability has increased dramatically (from 49.6%
in 1988 to 58.5% in 2003, a rise of 17.9%). It’s no wonder people are not as
eager to buy LTC insurance as insurers would like them to be! No wonder nursing
homes are struggling financially -- their dependency on stingy government
reimbursements is increasing, while their more profitable private payers are
disappearing. Unfortunately, these problems are even worse than the
preceding data suggest. Over half of the so-called "out-of-pocket"
costs reported by CMS are really just contributions toward their cost of care by
people already covered by Medicaid! These are not out-of-pocket costs in terms
of asset spend-down, but rather only income, most of which comes from Social
Security benefits, another government program. Thus, although Medicaid pays less
than half the cost of nursing home care (46.1% of the dollars in 2003), it
covers 70% of all nursing home residents. Because people in nursing homes on
Medicaid tend to be long-stayers, Medicaid pays something toward 80% of all
patient days. So what? Medicaid pays in full or subsidizes four-fifths of
all nursing home patient days. If it pays even one dollar per month (with the
rest contributed from the recipient’s income), the nursing home receives
Medicaid's dismally low reimbursement rate. No wonder the public is not as
worried about nursing home costs as LTC insurers think they should be. No wonder
nursing homes are facing insolvency all around the United States when so much of
their revenue comes from Medicaid, often at reimbursement rates less than the
cost of providing the care. Don't be fooled by the 7.6% of nursing home costs that CMS
reports as having been paid by “private health insurance” in 2003. CMS
derives that number by subtracting all the known costs from 100% and reporting
the remainder as private insurance. No one knows how much private health
insurance really pays toward nursing home care because most long-term care
insurance pays beneficiaries, not nursing homes. Thus, a large proportion of
insurance payments for nursing-home care gets reported as if it were
out-of-pocket payments because private payers write the checks to the nursing
home but are reimbursed by their LTC insurance policies. This fact further
inflates the out-of-pocket figure artificially. How does all this affect assisted living facilities? ALFs are
90% private pay and they cost an average of $30,288 per year (source: MetLife).
Many people who could afford assisted living by spending down their illiquid
wealth choose instead to take advantage of Medicaid nursing-home benefits.
Medicaid exempts one home and all contiguous property, one business, and one
automobile, all of unlimited value, plus many other non-countable assets, not to
mention sophisticated asset-sheltering techniques marketed by Medicaid planning
attorneys. Income rarely interferes with Medicaid nursing-home eligibility
unless such income far exceeds the cost of private nursing-home care. So what? For most people, Medicaid nursing-home benefits are
easy to obtain without spending down assets significantly, and Medicaid's
income-contribution requirement is usually much less expensive than paying the
full cost of assisted living. No wonder ALFs are struggling to attract enough
private payers to be profitable. No wonder people are not as eager to buy LTC
insurance as insurers would like them to be. The situation with home health care financing is very similar
to nursing-home financing. According to CMS, America spent $40 billion on home health
care in 2003. Medicare and Medicaid paid 57% of this total and private insurance
paid 18.3%. Only 16.5% of home health care costs were paid out of pocket. The
remainder came from several small public and private financing sources. So what? Less than one out of every six dollars spent on home
health care comes out of the pockets of patients. No wonder they do not feel the
sense of urgency about this risk that long-term care insurers think they should. Bottom line, people only buy insurance against real financial
risk. As long as they can ignore the risk, avoid the premiums and get government
to pay for their long-term care when and if such care is needed, they will
remain in denial about the need for LTC insurance. As long as Medicaid and
Medicare are paying for a huge proportion of all nursing-home and home health
care costs while out-of-pocket expenditures remain only nominal, nursing homes
and home health agencies will remain starved for financial oxygen. The solution is simple. Target Medicaid financing of long-term
care to the needy and use the savings to fund education and tax incentives to
encourage the public to plan early to be able to pay privately for long-term
care. For more ideas and recommendations on how to implement this
solution, see www.centerltc.org. Note
especially The Realist's Guide to Medicaid and Long-Term Care and How
to Save Medicaid $20 Billion per Year AND Improve the Program in the Process. |
|
2212
Queen Anne Avenue North, #110, Seattle, Washington 98109 ~ Phone (206) 283-7036
~ Fax (206) 283-6536 Email info@centerltc.com ~ Ask how you can support the Center today! ~ Subscribe to "LTC Bullets" Please address all web site feedback to webmaster@centerltc.com |